Action Intelligence

Action Intelligence™

From insight to action

The system never stops at reporting. Every KPI generates a gap analysis, prioritised actions with named owners, expected outcomes and the measurement that proves it worked.

Wind turbines silhouetted at dusk with a technician walking at the base

GE Vernova · Oaxaca Wind Farm, Mexico

Wind Turbine Availability

Oaxaca wind farm at blue hour — the power that keeps the lights on after dinner.

The Gap Analyzer™ · GE Vernova · Oaxaca Wind Farm, Mexico

Wind Turbine Availability

Priority High 24 Hours Maintenance Team

Current state

95%

Target state

98%

Gap

3.0%

Confidence

87%

Analysis chain

Current StateTarget StateGapPriorityRoot CausesRecommended ActionsExpected OutcomesSuccess Metrics

Every dashboard answers nine questions

What happened?

Fleet availability held at 95% for the last 14 days, three points below the contracted target of 98%.

Why did it happen?

Downtime is concentrated in nine turbines on the western ridge, where two unplanned gearbox interventions overlapped with a planned inspection window.

What is the gap?

95% today against a target of 98% — a gap of 3.0 points.

How serious is it?

Serious but recoverable. At 95% the site still meets grid commitments, though a further one-point slip would trigger a contractual availability review.

What caused it?

Scheduled maintenance clustering · Unexpected equipment failures · Weather conditions · Supply chain delays · Operational scheduling — presented as hypotheses, tested below.

Who should respond?

Maintenance Team, within 24 Hours.

What actions should be taken today?

Engineering, Operations, Supply Chain have same-day actions.

What happens if we do nothing?

If nothing changes, availability likely drifts toward 93–94% as the inspection backlog grows, roughly 2.1 GWh of clean generation goes unproduced this quarter, and around 6,400 households fall back onto higher-carbon supply.

How will we measure improvement?

Unplanned stop count per 100 turbine-days · Planned downtime hours per week (variance) · Critical spare fill rate …

Possible contributing factors

Hypotheses, not assumptions

Each factor below is supported by a specific piece of operational data. Confidence shows how strongly the data supports it — a human still decides.

Scheduled maintenance clustering

84% supported

62% of downtime hours fell inside two planned windows that ran back to back.

Unexpected equipment failures

71% supported

Two gearbox temperature excursions preceded unplanned stops on turbines 14 and 22.

Weather conditions

58% supported

Sustained crosswinds above 19 m/s blocked crane access on four working days.

Supply chain delays

63% supported

Two pitch-bearing kits are showing an eleven-day lead time against a five-day plan.

Operational scheduling

49% supported

Crew coverage on the western ridge is one technician below the staffing model.

AI decision engine

How the system rates this

Urgency
High
Confidence
87%
Potential business impact
High
Potential community impact
Medium
Suggested response time
24 Hours
Recommended owner
Maintenance Team
Model confidence87%

Confidence reflects how well available operational data supports the leading hypothesis. It is a starting point for a human decision, not a verdict.

Action recommendations

Every recommendation carries an owner, a priority, an outcome, a measurement and a timeline

Engineering

High

Review maintenance records for the nine western-ridge turbines and confirm gearbox wear trend.

Owner
Reliability Engineering Lead
Expected outcome
Root cause confirmed or ruled out for the two unplanned stops.
Measurement
Unplanned stop count per 100 turbine-days
Timeline
24 hours

Operations

High

Evaluate turbine scheduling and resource allocation so planned windows no longer overlap.

Owner
Site Operations Manager
Expected outcome
Planned downtime hours spread evenly across the month.
Measurement
Planned downtime hours per week (variance)
Timeline
3 days

Supply Chain

High

Check availability of critical replacement parts, especially pitch bearings and gearbox filters.

Owner
Regional Parts Planner
Expected outcome
Critical spares held on site rather than ordered on failure.
Measurement
Critical spare fill rate
Timeline
5 days

Leadership

Medium

Review recurring downtime trends across the Latin America fleet in the monthly operating review.

Owner
Regional Fleet Director
Expected outcome
Systemic pattern identified across sites, not just Oaxaca.
Measurement
Fleet availability spread (best vs. worst site)
Timeline
2 weeks

Communications

Medium

Inform grid and community stakeholders of expected maintenance activity where appropriate.

Owner
Community Relations Partner
Expected outcome
No surprises for the offtaker or the surrounding municipalities.
Measurement
Stakeholder notifications sent ahead of planned work
Timeline
1 week

Learning

Medium

Share best practices from higher-performing sites, starting with the 98.6% site in Bahia.

Owner
Technical Training Lead
Expected outcome
Bahia's pre-window checklist adopted on the western ridge.
Measurement
Technicians certified on the new checklist
Timeline
3 weeks

Expected impact

If these actions are successful

  • Availability may improve toward the 98% target.
  • Reliability increases as gearbox interventions become planned rather than reactive.
  • Maintenance efficiency improves through spread windows and on-site spares.
  • Operational resilience strengthens across the regional fleet.
  • Customer confidence improves ahead of the contract review.

If we do nothing

If nothing changes, availability likely drifts toward 93–94% as the inspection backlog grows, roughly 2.1 GWh of clean generation goes unproduced this quarter, and around 6,400 households fall back onto higher-carbon supply.

Progress tracker

Closing the gap

Current

95%

Gap

3.0%

Target

98%

95%95.4%96%96.6%97.2%97.6%98%
Gap closed so far0%
Fastest recovery Zero-incident week Knowledge shared

Same gap, five ways of caring

Who needs to understand this?

Executive boardroom at night with glowing data screens above a city skyline

Executive view

Wind Turbine Availability

Where the decision is signed — measured in lives, not just line items.

One site is three points short of its availability commitment, with the cause narrowed to clustered maintenance on nine turbines. A 24-hour engineering review and a rescheduled maintenance calendar are the two decisions that matter this week.

AI Improvement Lab™

Every issue becomes something the company learns

Improvement ideas

  • Stagger planned maintenance windows so no two overlap on the same ridge.
  • Hold pitch bearings and gearbox filters as on-site critical spares.

Innovation suggestions

  • Trial a lightweight crane-free access rig for high-crosswind days.
  • Pilot acoustic gearbox monitoring alongside temperature sensing.

Automation opportunities

  • Auto-alert when gearbox temperature drifts two standard deviations from the fleet median.
  • Auto-reorder critical spares when on-site stock falls below a two-week cover.

AI recommendations

  • Rebalance the western-ridge crew by one technician for the next 30 days.
  • Move the second inspection window nine days later to break the cluster.

Knowledge articles

  • Bahia pre-window checklist
  • Gearbox thermal drift field guide

Training resources

  • Condition monitoring refresher
  • Crosswind access safety module

Cross-functional collaboration

  • Pair Oaxaca and Bahia site leads for a fortnightly 30-minute exchange.
  • Bring Supply Chain into the weekly maintenance planning call.

Success dashboard

How we know it is working

Gap Closed42%
Improvement Rate68%
Innovation Adoption54%
Knowledge Sharing77%
Employee Participation81%
Community Communication63%
Customer Satisfaction88%
Recognition72%

Executive view

Across every open gap today

Top priorities

  • Oaxaca wind availability — 3 point gap, 24-hour engineering review
  • Manchester imaging uptime — 118 diagnoses rescheduled
  • Lisbon overhaul turnaround — four aircraft held into peak season

Highest risks

  • A further point of wind availability loss triggers a contractual review
  • Imaging backlog compounds into a nine-day waiting-list extension
  • Peak-season aircraft availability shortfall for two airline customers

Largest opportunities

  • Fleet-wide adoption of the Bahia pre-window checklist
  • Predictive coil monitoring across all UK imaging sites
  • Digital teardown twin for pre-induction scope accuracy

Projects requiring attention

  • Western-ridge crew staffing, one technician below model
  • Regional spare coil staging, currently central only
  • Test cell utilisation at 97%, no recovery slack

Recognition opportunities

  • Oaxaca night crew caught turbine 22 before hard failure
  • Manchester radiography absorbed 40 extra scans, zero incidents
  • Lisbon test cell crew recovered two days by overnight re-sequencing

Learning opportunities

  • Gearbox thermal drift field guide, now fleet-wide
  • Artefact recognition module for radiographers
  • Borescope accuracy workshop for overhaul technicians

Final rule: every problem ends with a recommendation — and every recommendation names an owner, a priority, an expected outcome, a measurement and a timeline.